Lab-Grown Gem Property Table

Grown, not found · Field guide

Reference

Typical published values. Ranges vary with dopant, composition and measurement wavelength, and a leading ≈ marks figures that are approximate or thinly published — treat those as a starting point rather than a specification.

Want it sorted by refractive index, lowest to highest, with links to what we stock? That is the refractive index list: 40 materials, RI and birefringence only.

Physical and optical properties

Material Formula System Mohs Refractive index Birefringence Dispersion SG Natural analog
Diamond C Cubic 10 2.417 none 0.044 3.52 Direct twin
Moissanite (SiC) SiC Hexagonal (4H / 6H) 9.25 2.648–2.691 0.043 0.104 3.21 Rare echo
Corundum Al₂O₃ Trigonal 9 1.762–1.770 0.008 0.018 3.99–4.00 Direct twin
Chrysoberyl BeAl₂O₄ Orthorhombic 8.5 1.745–1.755 0.008–0.010 0.015 3.73 Direct twin
LuAG Lu₃Al₅O₁₂ Cubic 8.5 1.84 none ≈0.025 6.73 No natural analog
YAP (Pr:YAlO₃) YAlO₃ Orthorhombic perovskite 8.5 ≈1.92–1.95 ≈0.01 ≈0.02 5.35 No natural analog
YAG Y₃Al₅O₁₂ Cubic 8–8.5 1.833 ±0.010 none 0.028 4.50–4.60 No natural analog
Cubic zirconia ZrO₂ (Y- or Ca-stabilized) Cubic 8–8.5 2.15–2.18 none 0.058–0.066 5.6–6.0 Rare echo
GAGG Gd₃Al₂Ga₃O₁₂ Cubic ≈8 ≈1.92 none ≈0.03 ≈6.6 No natural analog
Spinel (Verneuil) ≈MgO·2.5Al₂O₃ Cubic, strained 8 1.727–1.730 anomalous only 0.020 3.63–3.65 No natural analog
Spinel (flux) MgAl₂O₄ Cubic 8 ≈1.718 none 0.020 3.58–3.61 Direct twin
Beryl Be₃Al₂Si₆O₁₈ Hexagonal 7.5–8 1.564–1.600 0.005–0.009 0.014 2.67–2.78 Direct twin
Nanosital SiO₂–Al₂O₃ glass-ceramic None (nanocrystals in glass) 7 1.65–1.70 none 0.015 3.5–4.0 No natural analog
Quartz SiO₂ Trigonal 7 1.544–1.553 0.009 0.013 2.65 Direct twin
GGG Gd₃Ga₅O₁₂ Cubic 6.5–7 1.970 (+0.060) none 0.045 7.05 No natural analog
Rutile TiO₂ Tetragonal 6–6.5 2.616–2.903 0.287 0.280 4.25 Rare echo
Lithium niobate LiNbO₃ Trigonal 5–5.5 2.21–2.30 0.090 0.120 4.64 No natural analog
Strontium titanate SrTiO₃ Cubic 5–6 2.409 none 0.190 5.13 Rare echo
Bismuth germanate (BGO) Bi₄Ge₃O₁₂ Cubic 5 2.15 none ≈0.10 7.13 No natural analog
KTP KTiOPO₄ Orthorhombic 5 1.74–1.83 ≈0.09 ≈0.04 3.03 No natural analog
YVO₄ YVO₄ Tetragonal ≈5 1.99 / 2.22 ≈0.22 ≈0.08 4.22 Rare echo
Zincite ZnO Hexagonal 4–5 2.013–2.029 0.016 0.127 5.68 Rare echo
Fluorite CaF₂ Cubic 4 1.434 none 0.007 3.18 Direct twin

Critical angle and why it matters

Total internal reflection only happens beyond the critical angle, and that angle falls as refractive index rises. So leakage runs from high RI to low: a shallow pavilion designed for CZ or rutile will leak in quartz. A steep quartz pavilion won't leak that way in CZ or rutile, but it usually looks darker and less lively than the material should. If you take one number from this page into the workshop, take this one.

Material Refractive index Critical angle
Fluorite 1.434 44.2°
Quartz 1.544–1.553 40.2°
Beryl 1.564–1.600 39.4°
Nanosital 1.65–1.70 37.3°
Spinel (flux) ≈1.718 35.6°
Chrysoberyl 1.745–1.755 34.8°
Corundum 1.762–1.770 34.5°
YAG 1.833 ±0.010 33.1°
LuAG 1.84 32.9°
GAGG ≈1.92 31.4°
YAP (Pr:YAlO₃) ≈1.92–1.95 31.2°
GGG 1.970 (+0.060) 30.5°
Zincite 2.013–2.029 29.7°
YVO₄ 1.99 / 2.22 28.4°
Cubic zirconia 2.15–2.18 27.5°
Lithium niobate 2.21–2.30 26.4°
Strontium titanate 2.409 24.5°
Diamond 2.417 24.4°
Moissanite (SiC) 2.648–2.691 22.0°
Rutile 2.616–2.903 21.2°

The practical rule: higher RI means shallower pavilion angles. Most faceting design libraries specify the RI range a design was optimized for. Using a design outside that range is the most common reason a technically well-cut stone looks dark in the middle.

Growth method and origin

Material Grown by Originally developed for
Beryl Flux, hydrothermal Gems, full stop (Nacken 1920s, IG Farben 1930s)
Chrysoberyl Czochralski, flux, floating zone Gems (Creative Crystals, 1973), with laser rods developed alongside
Corundum Verneuil, Czochralski, Kyropoulos, flux, hydrothermal, HEM, EFG Gems and watch bearings — then LED substrates and phone windows
Cubic zirconia Skull melting (cold crucible) Refractory and laser-host research, Moscow, 1960s–70s
Diamond HPHT press; microwave plasma CVD Abrasive grit (GE, 1955)
Fluorite Bridgman–Stockbarger Deep-UV lithography lenses and infrared windows
GAGG Czochralski Fast scintillator for medical and security imaging
GGG Czochralski Substrate for magnetic bubble memory
Lithium niobate Czochralski Optical modulators and the SAW filters in most phones
LuAG Czochralski, Bridgman Scintillator for medical imaging and particle detectors
Moissanite (SiC) Physical vapor transport Abrasive, then LED and power-electronics wafers
Nanosital Melt, then controlled crystallization Engineering glass-ceramics (cookware, radomes, mirror blanks)
Quartz Hydrothermal Piezoelectric oscillators for radio and electronics
Rutile Verneuil, then oxygen anneal Pigment research at National Lead, with a cut gem as a stated goal
Spinel (flux) Flux, Czochralski, Verneuil (off-composition) An accident while chasing cobalt-blue sapphire
Strontium titanate Verneuil Physical-property research at National Lead; sold as a diamond simulant from about 1955
YAG Czochralski Nd:YAG laser host (Bell Labs, 1964)
YAP (Pr:YAlO₃) Czochralski Laser host and fast scintillator
YVO₄ Czochralski Optical isolators for fiber telecom; Nd:YVO₄ laser host
Zincite Accidental vapor deposition in smelter flues Nothing — it was industrial waste

A reference to lab-grown gem materials, written for cutters. Values are typical published figures; ranges vary with composition, dopant and measurement wavelength. Nothing here is a substitute for a laboratory report on a stone whose identity matters commercially.